Resources

Measuring Intimate Partner Violence, Partner Sexual Abuse, and Stalking: Considerations and Critiques

Published by: Sherry Hamby, TK Logan, Teri Faragher

This webinar explores the ways in which the measurement of Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) has systematically mis-represented gender patterns. More particularly, the presenters discuss how assessing physical assault in ways that capture too many incidents of horseplay and joking around renders sexual victimization invisible. Current research surveillance of homicide systematically under-represents male IPV, because current homicide databases categorize “collateral” IPV victims, such as children, family members, or women’s new partners without contextualizing their killings. Such multiple victim homicides are overwhelmingly perpetrated by men. 

Finally, issues and challenges related to assessing coercive control and cyber-abuse are discussed and assessment tools are recommended.

Related resources

Intimate Partner Violence Survivors’ Perspectives of Safety and the Risk of Firearms

BWJP conducted a series of interviews with survivors of intimate partner violence affected by firearms to understand their own perceptions…

Considerations When Safety Planning with Criminalized Survivors

(March 2026) Advocates who are working with charged or convicted survivors can provide critical guidance through the safety planning process…

Intimate Partner Violence Survivors’ Perspectives of Safety and the Risk of Firearms

BWJP conducted a series of interviews with survivors of intimate partner violence affected by firearms to understand their own perceptions…